论《国际商事合同通则》解释补充《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》之功能——以损害赔偿制度为例  

Study on Interpretive and Supplementary Functions of PICC to CISG——Taking the Damages System as Examples

作　　者：左海聪[1] 杨梦莎 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2016年第1期149-161,共13页Journal of Comparative Law

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"<国际商事合同通则>与国际商法的发展"(07SFB2045)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《国际商事合同通则》(PICC)具有解释补充《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(CISG)的功能。其法理依据是PICC可以作为辅助性法源,帮助进一步阐释CISG的一般法律原则。以有关损害赔偿制度的理论和实践为例,这一做法符合CISG第7条统一法方法义务,并相较其他解释补充方法具有保障CISG国际性、统一性的优势。但前提条件是其并不违反CISG一般法律原则,且未超出CISG的调整范围。PICC has interpretive and supplementary functions to CISG. The juristic basis is that PICC can be the auxiliary legal source of CISG, which helps to explain the general principles of CISG better. Taking the theory and practice about damages as examples, this approach complies with the uniform approach obligations under Article 7 of CISG, and has advantages of ensuring the international and uniformity characters of CISG comparing with other interpretation and supplementary methods. But the preconditions are its counterpart provisions to CISG do not violate the general principles and outrun the scope of CISG.

关 键 词：联合国国际货物销售合同公约 国际商事合同通则 解释补充 损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]