中国司法失范形态及其矫正  

The Forms of Judicial Anomie in China and Its Correction

作　　者：张倩[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学台湾研究所,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期54-57,共4页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家2011计划"司法文明协同创新"项目

摘　　要："失范"原本是社会学中的概念,最早是由法国社会学家涂尔干提出的,而后美国学者默顿发展了此理论。将"失范"一词引入司法中,能够形象地描述中国司法运行中的问题。司法失范是指司法过程中存在的因文化目标与制度化手段的不平衡而导致的司法行为与司法规则的离散状态。在中国司法权运行过程中,存在司法失范现象,具体表现为司法规范之阙如、司法规范之不能、司法权力之滥用,这些不仅严重侵蚀了中国的司法权威,而且损害了人民的切身利益。针对中国司法权运行过程中出现的失范现象,可以从完善司法体系、强化司法惩戒机制、提高司法者素质等方面进行矫正。只有明确中国司法失范的表现形式及其矫正方式,才能重建中国的司法权威、保障公民权利。＂Anomie＂ is originally a concept in Emile Durkheim, and the American scholar Morton the judicial field can vividly describe the problems sociology. It was first put forward by the French sociologist developed the theory later on. Introduing ＂anomie＂ into that exist in the judicial operation.Judicial anomie is the state that the judicial practice gets out of the judicial rules control due to the imbalance of cultural goals and institutionalized means. Judicial anomie behaviors in the progress of the jurisdiction are still common, such as judicial anomie, lack of legal norms, lack of ability of specification.This has not only severely eroded the judi- cial authority of China, but also damaged the vital interests of the people.To rectify the anomie phenomenon in the process of judicial power operation, we can perfect the legal system, strengthen the judicial punishment mechanism and improve the quality of the law. Only defining the behaviors and correcting the judicial anomie can reinstate the judicial authority and protect the rights and interests of citizens.

关 键 词：中国司法 司法失范 司法权 司法权威 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]