“刑变罚恒”的价值背离及其重塑  

Value Deviation of‘Penalty Changed but the Execution of Punishment not Changed'and Its Remodeling

作　　者：阴建峰[1] 贾长森[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第2期31-41,共11页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：刑法修订带来的法定刑变更势必会对刑罚的执行产生影响,修改前后法定刑的巨大差异甚至会导致"同罪异罚"之局面。考虑到量刑的价值依据是公正,行刑的价值依据在于矫正,如何在刑罚执行过程中彰显刑罚的价值,并化解"刑变罚恒"之弊病,便成为我国司法实践中必须直面的问题。赦免制度无疑是最合适的救济路径,但因立法、司法等诸多因素所限,短期内尚难以真正发挥其应有价值。比较而言,减刑、假释制度仍可谓我国当下最实用的应对之策。Changes of statutory sentence brought by Penal Code amendments will inevitably have an impact on enforcement of criminal punishment. The huge difference between the modified statutory sentence and the unmodified will cause ＂the same crime different punishments ＂situation. Because of sentencing is based on the fair value,the value of execution is correction,how to reflect the value during the execution of penal sentences and resolve the question ＂criminal punishment of constant change＂is a problem to face straightly. Pardon system is undoubtedly the most suitable route,but due to much restrictions on the legislative and judicial,which cannot play the proper value,by contrast,commutation and parole system is the most practical method.

关 键 词：刑变罚恒 目的刑 赦免 减刑 假释 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]