检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津中医药大学,天津300193 [2]天津中医药大学第一附属医院,天津300193
出 处:《针灸临床杂志》2016年第1期29-31,共3页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的:观察针刺天容穴为主治疗吞咽障碍的临床疗效。方法:50例脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者被随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组25例。治疗组采用针刺天容、廉泉、外金津、玉液等穴治疗,对照组采用康复训练治疗。采用标准吞咽功能评分(SSA)、洼田氏饮水试验评价标准对两组疗效进行评价。结果:两组治疗后SSA总分、洼田氏饮水试验评分差异有统计学意义。治疗组总有效率为88%,对照组总有效率为80%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:针刺天容穴为主的综合疗效优于康复训练治疗。Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of acupuncture at Tianrong( SI17) on dysphagia.Methods: Fifty dysphagia patients were randomized into two groups by the SAS statistical software,with 25 in each group.The treatment group was treated by acupuncture at Tianrong( SI17),Lianquan( RN23),Waijinjin and Yuye,while the control group was treated by rehabilitation training.The efficacy was assessed by the standardized Swallowing Assessment and Kubota water drinking test.Results: The differences of SSA and Kubota water drinking test between two groups after treatment were statistically significant.The total effective rate was 88% in the treatment group,versus 80% in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0.05).Conclusion: Acupuncture at Tianrong( SI17),Lianquan( RN23),Waijinjin and Yuye can have a higher compositive efficacy than rehabilitation training for treating dysphagia.
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.135.237