检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪栋[1]
出 处:《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年第1期101-106,共6页Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金项目"宪法程序的英国普通法渊源研究"(10BFX054)
摘 要:美国联邦宪法正当程序起源于英格兰的普通法传统。尽管早期正当法律程序更多是程序性规则,但是,经过自然权利哲学的改造,它在美国法律制度中开始向实体性正当程序发展。实体性正当法律程序与程序性正当法律程序都与自然权利存在着内在的关联。早期的关联只是作为一种受传统自然法严格限制的事实而存在,而后来实体性正当法律程序的产生,则表明普通法的法官已经清晰地意识到这种内在关联,自觉将自然权利原则运用于对传统程序的创新,进一步发展与充实了正当法律程序的内涵。正当法律程序从程序性内涵向实体性内涵的演变,是普通法程序与自然权利观念逐步融合的结果。The due process of American constitution originated from the tradition of English common law.Although early due process was more procedural rules than substantial ones, it had developed into substantial procedure in American legal system after the philosophical reform of natural rights. Both the substantive due process and the procedural due process are intrinsically related to natural rights. The early association existed as a fact which is limited strictly by traditional natural law. And the subsequent substantive due process indicates that the judges were well aware of this intrinsic relationship, consciously applied the principles of natural rights to the innovation of traditional procedure, which further developed and enriched the content of due process of law. The evolution from procedural connotation to substantive connotation of due process of law is the result of gradual combination of process of common law and the idea of natural right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.19