检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2016年第2期117-119,共3页Chinese Health Service Management
基 金:2014年江苏省研究生培养创新工程"医务人员生命健康权益保障机制研究"(编号:KYLX-0980)
摘 要:近年来,因为各种原因非精神性住院患者自杀事件时有发生,社会各方对相关法律责任存在不同看法,医方往往认为患者自杀行为是患者本人对生命的放弃,与其诊疗行为无因果关系,医院不应该承担责任;患方则认为医院对患者具有特殊的注意义务,不应该狭隘的理解为是否遵守诊疗技术规范,也包括对患者精神状态的观察以及相关后果的防范;在诉讼过程中,法院的判决依据以及裁定结果也不统一。各方对法律责任看法的不一致,导致了此类问题发生以后,医患双方都需要耗费大量精力财力处理善后事宜,文章旨在对相关法律问题进行归纳和分析,为维护合理的诊疗秩序提供参考。Non-mental inpatients committee suicide happened usually due to various reasons in recent years,and relevant parties take different views on related legal liabilities. Hospitals usually believed they should not take the responsibilities because the suicide of patients was the abandonment of their lives,which did not form the casual relationship with diagnosis and treatment.Patients hold the view that hospitals have special duty of care to them,which should not be interpreted as if diagnosis and treatment norms are obeyed,the duty also included the observation of mental state and the prevention of consequences to the patients.In proceedings,ground of court decision was not in accord with result of judgment. Both hospitals and patients spend lots of energy and money handling problems because different parties hold different views on legal liabilities.This essay aims at concluding and analyzing related legal issues and providing reference to maintaining reasonable diagnosis and treatment order.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3