检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张婷[1]
出 处:《陕西行政学院学报》2016年第1期111-115,共5页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance
摘 要:公共决策者担任着揭示社会对市场失灵或价格机制作用甚微等领域资源配置的偏好和成本的任务。这样的思考方式为研究最符合经济效率和社会公平目标的医疗资源配置提供了有效原则。政府健康投入对居民健康效用的影响表现在两个层面:群体健康的结果和分布以及个体不同生命阶段中健康决定因素模式。健康投入的经济价值在于改善个体健康状况的同时直接改善居民平均健康水平;居民健康效用的提升依赖规模适度且结构合理的健康投入。Public policymakers hold the missions of revealing the preference and the cost of resource allocation in the fields of market failure or marginal effect on price mechanism. This way of thinking provides the effective principles in order to study the best re-source allocation of healthcare in line with the economic efficiency and the target of social equity. It shows two aspects of how govern-ment health input effects on population health utility: the results and distribution of group health; and the patterns of health determinants in different life stages of individuals. The economic value of government health input improves the average population health condition while it is acting on the individual health status. The population health utility improvements rely on the appropriate scaled and rational structured health input by government.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15