考察与反思:英国刑法犯罪故意的历史来源与存在样态——兼评犯罪故意与过失的价值性判断  

Investigation and Reflection on the Historical Sources and Existence Patterns of Criminal Intention in UK Criminal Law——On the Review of Valuable Judgment between Criminal Intention and Negligence

作　　者：姜盼盼[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学法律硕士教育学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期69-75,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：对英国刑法犯罪主观罪过的研究离不开对其历史来源与存在样态的考察,其中犯罪故意的理论源流是刑法学界一直研究的重点问题。在古罗马时期,英国刑法犯意就有意识作了区分,后直至中世纪时期,英国犯意逐渐成文化,犯意被区分成直接故意和间接故意两部分,其考察基点分别见于犯罪故意惩罚的正当性以及教会法的罪孽思想。基于概念上的前思和思维上的选择,认为故意采纳"结果目的性"理论,过失采纳"结果必然性"理论,达到合理人标准才是故意应受谴责性的实质的结论,思维模式的选择比应有的影响具有更大冲击的概念性区别。In order to study the subjective guilt of criminal law in UK,it is necessary to investigate its historical sources and existence patterns,especially the theoretical sources of criminal intention in UK,which are regarded as the researching focus in the field of criminal law. In Ancient Rome period,mensrea of UK criminal law commenced to be distinguished consciously. Then in Medieval Ages,mensreagradually became an culture,and included direct intention and oblique intention,which was based on the legitimacy of punishment in criminal intention and thought of sin in cannon law. According to the conceptual reflection and thinking selection,it is thought that criminal intention adopts the theory of ＂ purposeful result ＂ while negligence adopts the theory of ＂ inevitable result＂,and conforming to the standards of a reasonable person is the real essence of culpability on criminal intention. Meanwhile,the choice of thought mode is more impactful than due influence in conceptual distinction.

关 键 词：英国刑法 应受谴责性 犯罪故意 轻率 疏忽 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]