余嘉锡《四库提要辨证·神僧传》考证辨析  

Yu Jiaxi's Textual Criticism and Discrimination on God Monk Biography of Four Abstract Dialectics

作　　者：元文广[1,2] 靳利翠[3] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学文学院,陕西西安710127 [2]西安航空学院人文学院,陕西西安710077 [3]河北工程大学校办公室,河北邯郸056038

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期81-84,共4页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：余嘉锡所著《四库提要辨证》是对《四库全书总目》研究的重要成果。此书对《四库总目》中的490余篇提要进行了辨证,提出不少宝贵意见,但也存在一些可以进一步讨论的问题。仅就《四库提要辨证·神僧传》条的考证思路、论据等进行讨论,认为余嘉锡先生从目录学角度讨论《神僧传》的撰者问题,其论述过程不够严谨,所提供论据存在问题,不能直接指向结论,因此,所得结论很难令人信服。从《神僧传》版本源流角度入手,用直接论据使《神僧传》撰者问题更加明确、所得结论《神僧传》为明成祖所撰集更具说服力。Four Abstract Dialecticswritten by Yu Jiaxi is one important result of the research on ＂ Four Abstract Dialectics＂. In this book,Yu made dialectical research on490 articles in General Catalogue of Si Ku Quan Shu,presenting some valuable suggestions. However,there are some problems which need further discussion. The dialectical thought train and grounds of argument for God Monk Biography of Four Abstract Dialectics are one example that needs further discussion. Since he studied the author from the angle of its catalogue,Yu＇s argument process of Biography of God Monk was not precise,and grounds of argument he offered could not reach the conclusion,so his conclusion was unconvincing. If the study starts with the version source of Biography of God Monk,makes the author of God Monk Biography more clear with direct grounds,and thus reach a more persuasive conclusion that Biography of God Monk was written by Emperor Cheng Zu in Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：余嘉锡 《四库提要辨证》 《神僧传》 版本源流 撰者问题 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]