高速公路PPP项目特许权协议中“政府保证”的法律分析  

Legal Analysis of “Government Guarantee” in Concession Agreement of the Freeway PPP Project

作　　者：谢春艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期157-160,共4页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：湖南省交通运输厅科技进步与创新项目计划(201439)

摘　　要：在高速公路PPP项目特许权协议中,政府作为合作方在该协议中就特许权期限、非竞争性、税收优惠、回购事项、浮动利率、其他政策优惠等方面做出的"保证",不属于法律意义上作为担保方式之一的保证,而属于特许权协议中的政府义务。该类协议中政府义务在主体、目的、法律地位、内容、程序等方面均不同于民事合同中的义务。一旦当事人就"政府保证"发生争议,当事人可以协商、诉讼和仲裁的方式解决纠纷。诉讼方式则依《行政诉讼法》进行,其中尚需适用《合同法》的有关条款。于理而言,当事人依法提起民事诉讼亦无不可。In the PPP project of the freeway,guarantees made by the government as a partner in the concession period,noncompetitive,tax incentives,repurchase matters,floating interest rate and other preferential policies,do not belong to the legal guarantee,but the government obligation in the concession agreement,which is apparently different from the civil contract obligations in the main body,purpose,legal status,content,procedure and so on.Once disputes centered on＂government guarantee＂happen,the parties can resolve the problem by negotiation,litigation and arbitration.The mode of litigation can be carried out in accordance with the ＂administrative procedure＂,which is still required to apply the relevant provisions of the contract law.In principle,the litigation can also be sued to a civil procedure by the parties in accordance with the law.

关 键 词：高速公路 PPP特许权协议 政府保证 非担保 合同条款 

分 类 号：D902[政治法律—法学理论]