检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田宏迩[1] 朱新云[2] 詹永国[1] 曹丽丽[1] 刘留留 马蕾[1] 张宏[1] 钱依宁[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学公共卫生学院,南京210009 [2]扬中市疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》2016年第2期81-85,共5页Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(14YJA840012);江苏省2015年度普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(SJLXl5_0070);东南大学大学生科研训练计划(SRTP)项目(15422023)
摘 要:目的探讨唾液中免疫球蛋白G(IgG)作为职业应激客观评价指标的可能性。方法于2014年9月随机抽取扬中市某太阳能光伏企业在职职工186人作为研究对象,进行问卷调查;采用酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)试验测定唾液中IgG的浓度。结果不同工龄、班制组间唾液中IgG浓度的差异有统计学意义(脚.05);工龄≤15年组职工唾液中IgG浓度[(49.93±7.97)μg/ml低于〉20年组[(53.80±8.22)μg/ml],长白班组唾液中IgG浓度[(54.98±7.62)μg/ml]高于白夜倒班组[(51.85_±7.94)μg/ml]。工作需求、工作危险低水平组唾液中IgG浓度[(54.09±6.68)、(53.73±7.35)μg/ml]高于高水平组[(50.65±8.81)、(50.73±8.73)μg/ml],差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);心理健康感评分高水平组IgG浓度[(54.39±5.28)μg/ml]高于低水平组[(50.73±9.36)μg/ml],差异有统计学意义(尸〈0.05);唾液中IgG浓度与心理健康感评分呈正相关(r=0.314,P〈0.05);而与工作需求、工作单调性、工作危险、工作前景、躯体抱怨、每日紧张感评分呈负相关(r=0.249、-0.159、-0.157、-0.030、-0.035、-0.176,均P〈0.05);多元线性回归分析显示,唾液中IgG浓度主要受工作需求、心理健康感的影响。结论唾液中IgG浓度有作为职业应激客观评价指标的可能性。Objective To investigate the possibility of salivary immunoglobulin G (IgG) as an objective assessment index for occupational stress. Methods In September 2014, a total of 186 employees in a solar photovohaic company were selected as research subjects, and a questionnaire survey was performed. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure salivary IgG concentration. Results The salivary IgG concentration showed a significant difference between employees with different working years and shifts(P〈0.05). The employees with ≤15 working years had a lower salivary IgG concentration than those with 〉20 working years (49.93±7.97μg/ml vs 53.80±8.22 μg/ml), and the employees with long-day shifts had a higher salivary IgG concentration than those with day-night shifts (54.98±7.62 μg/ml vs 51.85±7.94 μg/ml). The employees with low levels of job demands and job danger had a significantly higher salivary IgG concentration than those with high levels (54.09±6.68μg/ml vs 50.65±8.81 μg/ml, P〈0.05; 53.73±7.35 μg/ml vs 50.73±8.73 μg/ml, P〈0.05). The employees with a high score of mental health had a significantly higher salivary IgG concentration than those with a low score (54.39±5.28μg/ml vs 50.73±9.36μg/ml, P〈0.05). The salivary IgG concentration was positively correlated with the score of mental health (r=0.314, P〈0.05), but negatively correlated with job demands, job routinization, job danger, job prospects, physical complaints, and daily stress(r=-0.249, -0.159, -0.157, -0.030, -0.035, and -0.176, all P〈0.05). The muhivariate linear regression analysis showed that the salivary IgG concentration was mainly influenced by job demands and mental health. Conclusion Salivary IgG concentration can be applied as an objective assessment index for occupational stress.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28