监控者与管理者可否合一:行政法学体系转型的基础问题  

If the Supervisor and Administrator Can Be Unified:The Basic Issues in the Transformation of Administrative Jurisprudence

作　　者：沈岿[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学宪法与行政法研究中心

出　　处：《中国法学》2016年第1期105-125,共21页China Legal Science

摘　　要：新行政法研究观点纷呈,但其进路大致上可归为"内生增长论"和"结构转换论"。在其背后,又隐藏着传统行政法中占支配地位的监控者角色和被主流传统排挤但现下再露头角的管理者角色。前者以驯化、控制行政权为目的,以法官适法对行政进行形式合法性判断为导向,以法解释学/法教义学为基本方法;后者以高效实现行政目标和任务为目的,以政策形成、规则制定、制度设计为导向,以法政策学/社科法学为基本方法。在行政法学体系化方面,因为受抽象化、教义化任务的影响,关注行政目标和任务实现的管理者角色,可以适当融入拓展的监控者角色之中,但也存在限度。The concepts of new Administrative Law research are various, but the main ideas can be divided into endogenous？ growth theory and structural transformation theory. Behind this, there exists the role of supervisor who is dominant in traditional Administrative Law and the role of administrator who is outstanding again although crowded out by tradition before. The goal of the former is acclimation and the control of administrative fight with the law hermeneutic as the basic method; the purpose of the latter is to effectively achieve the administrative task and goal with policy formation, rulemaking and system design as its direction, and with policy science of law as the basic method. In the respect of Administrative Law systematism, with the influence of abstract and doctrinal task, it is necessary to pay attention to the role of administrator with administrative goal and task achievement, and appropriately integrate into the role of supervisor, while there exists the limitation.

关 键 词：监控者 管理者 行政法学体系 新行政法 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]