检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学经济学院,重庆401120 [2]天津理工大学管理学院,天津300387
出 处:《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》2016年第2期3-15,共13页Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基 金:西南政法大学重大专项项目(2014XZZD-003);重庆市哲学社会科学基金项目(2014YDJJ026)
摘 要:基于36个城市的1 223份问卷调查数据和与之相匹配的地市级宏观经济数据,以居民幸福感为社会福利成本度量衡,实证评估我国通货膨胀的代际间福利成本差异。研究发现,通货膨胀每上升1个百分点导致在职居民的幸福感下降约1.08%、退休居民的幸福感下降约为1.66%,而这一福利损失对于两个居民群体而言分别需要GDP增长率相应上升3.37个百分点和4.36个百分点才能弥补;在适应性预期条件下,预期型通货膨胀每上升1%所导致的在职居民和退休居民的幸福感分别下降约1.01%和0.60%,可知预期型通货膨胀对在职居民的负影响大于对退休居民的负影响;同时,预期型通货膨胀与非预期型通货膨胀对居民幸福感的影响存在显著差异,而与通货膨胀对居民幸福感的影响并没有太大差异。This paper, using residents' well-being as social welfare cost of measures and with the 1223 questionnaires survey data and the cities ' macroeconomic data, empirically assesses the inter- generational welfare cost, which is influenced by China's inflation, between working group and re- tirement group. We find that 1% rise of the inflation of China will results in about 1.08% decline of the happiness of working group and about 1.66% decline of the happiness of retirement group, and the corresponding welfare losses for each group need 3.37% and 4.36% of GDP growth to off- set respectively. Further, under the condition of adaptive expectations, we find that every 1% rise of expected inflation will bring the decline of happiness by about 1. 01% and 0. 6% of working group and retirement group respectively. At the Same time, we find that expected inflation and no- expected inflation have significantly different effects on the residents'happiness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117