检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林挺进[1]
出 处:《甘肃行政学院学报》2015年第6期12-21,125,共10页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
摘 要:本研究使用新加坡南洋理工大学2011年连氏中国城市公共服务质量调查在中国32个重要城市(直辖市、副省级城市、省会城市)的调查数据来回答一个城市的环境质量即环保绩效是否、如何以及在多大程度上影响了城市公众对于政府在环境保护方面工作的满意程度。与此同时,本研究还关注城市市长对于环保工作的偏好对于环保服务满意度的影响。由于研究同时包含了公众、城市(包括城市市长)两个层面的研究变量,所以本研究使用了分层线性模型(HLM)作为统计分析工具。数据显示,财政因素、城市领导的环保偏好以及环境质量本身,都能在一定程度上显著影响公众对于环保服务的满意程度,但从更深层次的分析来看,所有上述因素的影响机制都服务城市市长本身作为一名官僚之内在晋升冲动的解释逻辑。The study explores whether a city's environmental quality or the performance of environment-protection service influence citizens' satisfaction with municipal environment-protection service, how and why, by employing the data from Lien's Public Service Quality Survey in 32 major Chinese cities. Meanwhile, the research also enquires that whether mayors' preferences on environmental issues have some significant impacts on the citizens' satisfaction. As the statistical data have variables in two different levels, one is at the individual level and the other is as the city level, Hierarchal Liner Modelling is used to conduct statistical analysis. The empirical data confirms that environmental quality, local fiscal capacity and mayors' preferences are all significant predictors of citizens' satisfaction with environment-protection service. More importantly, the mechanism of these factors on the satisfaction is consistent with the logic of mayors' incentive for political promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28