检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋博[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会科学学院国际关系学系
出 处:《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》2016年第1期104-120,158,共17页Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies
摘 要:苏联解体以来,颜色革命逐渐成为冲击转型国家既有政治格局的主要因素,而青年政治组织成为这一波政治冲击中的主要挑战型力量。颜色革命式的政治冲击并非在每一个国家都能成功挑战现政权,这是因为当事国家针对青年政治组织采取了不同的治理方式。因此,国家对于青年政治组织的治理成为遏制颜色革命局势恶化的关键因素。本文应用案例比较和过程分析的方法,选取三个典型国家作为比较案例(格鲁吉亚、俄罗斯和乌克兰),发现国家对于青年政治组织的治理主要基于扩大参与或抑制动员两种逻辑。不同的治理逻辑导致国家遏制颜色革命冲击的结果大为不同。同时,随着转型国家自身政治环境的变化,国家既有的有效治理逻辑也遭遇挑战。Since the collapse of the Soviet Union,the Color Revolution gradually became the main factors that impact the political landscape in CIS countries. And youth political organizations are the main challengers against the wave of this kind of political shock.But the color-revolution styled political impact can't be realized in every country where is happened. The reasons for that are that the country in question has taken different management logic for youth political organization. Therefore management of youth political organization became the key factor to withstand color revolution. Using case comparison and analysis method,the author selects three typical countries( Georgia,Russia and Ukraine) to compare each other. Analysis found that governance,by government,of youth political organization mainly based on two logics of participation or inhibition mobilization. Different governance logic leads to different result of containing a color revolution impact. At the same time,along with the changes of political transition,countries with existing effective governance logic also encounter challenges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.100.199