检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李恩[1] 李平[2] 韩永斌[2] 刘宇强 范晓洁[2] 赵爱玲[2]
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学,山西太原030001 [2]山西医科大学第一医院 [3]山西省晋中市第一人民医院
出 处:《中国医学创新》2016年第3期11-14,共4页Medical Innovation of China
基 金:2015山西省科学技术发展计划(社会发展部分)项目(20150313012-7)
摘 要:目的:观察不同时间体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗骨不连的临床疗效。方法:收集本院2010-2015年收治的采用ESWT治疗骨不连的患者21例作为研究对象,以术后3~6个月患者为A组,以术后7~10个月患者为B组,两组均采用聚焦式体外冲击波机治疗,个性化确定治疗参数。定期复查X片,分析比较两组治疗效果。结果:两组组内不同时间骨痂及骨折线评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.001);两组组间不同时间骨痂及骨折线评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);骨痂及骨折线评分估算边际均值A组较B组上升趋势更明显。结论:ESWT治疗骨不连安全、有效,早期进行干预效果更佳。Objective: To observe the clinical curative effect of extraeorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) of different time points on bone nonunion.Method: 21 patients with bone nonunion undergoing extracorporea] shock wave treatment in our hospital from 2010 to 2015 were selected as the research objects. 11 patients 3 to 6 months after operation were selected as group A, 10 patients 7 to 10 months after operation were selected as group B.They were all treated by focused extraeorporeal shock wave therapy with personalized treatment parameters.They were regularly reviewed X-ray.The treatment effects were compared between the two groups.Result: The differences in scores of callus and fracture line of different time points inner the two groups were statistieally significant ( P〈0.001 ) .The differences in scores of callus and fracture line of different time points between the two groups were statistically significant (P〈0.05) .Conclusion: Extracorporeal shock wave treatment for bone nonunion is safe and effective, the effect of early intervention is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.17.231