检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱信葵
出 处:《中国医药科学》2015年第22期162-164,共3页China Medicine And Pharmacy
基 金:广东省东莞市科技计划项目(201310515000195)
摘 要:目的探讨应用社区督导治疗支气管哮喘患者的效果及感知力控制水平。方法将我院收治的121例慢性支气管哮喘患者随机分组,其中对照组60例给予对症医护治疗,观察组61例在此基础上加强社区督导治疗,对比两组肺功能、ACT与PCA评分。结果研究组患者的FEV1、FEV1/预计值百分比、ACT评分均显著高于对照组,差异具有显著性(P<0.05);两组入组时对比以及对照组入组时与治疗1年后的PCA评分对比,差异均不具显著性(P>0.05);治疗1年后,两组PCA评分对比以及观察组较入组时评分对比,差异均具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论将社区督导模式应用于对支气管哮喘患者的治疗,可有效提升其疗效与PCA评分,该法深具临床推广价值。Objective To explore the effect of applying community supervision in treatment of patients with bronchial asthma and the level of perceived stress. Methods Randomly divided 121 patients with bronchial asthma treated in our hospital into 2 groups,60 patients in control group were given medical treatment,the other 61 patients in observation group were given community supervision in addtion to medical treatment,then compared pulmonary function,ACT and PCA between 2 groups. Results FEV1,PEF% and ACT of research group were significantly higher than those of control group,there was statistically significant difference(P〈0.05); There was not significant difference in PCA between the groups before treatment and the control group before treatment and one year after treatment(P〉0.05);There was significant difference in PCA between the groups before treatment and the observation group before treatment and one year after treatment(P〈0.05). Conclusion The community supervision treatment in patients with bronchial asthma could efficiently improve curative effects and PCA scores,it has clinical popularized value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49