检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京协和医院,北京100730
出 处:《中国卫生产业》2015年第23期142-144,共3页China Health Industry
摘 要:目的探索研究电子问卷调查方式在门诊患者满意度调查中的优势,为提升满意度调查工作提供参考借鉴。方法分别采用纸质问卷与电子问卷,各随机选取750例门诊患者进行满意度调查,比较其满意度结果与患者意见收集情况。结果经检验结果显示,两种调查方式在满意度结果与收集患者意见方面的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论相较于纸质问卷,电子问卷调查方式具有结果真实性更高、能更有效的收集患者意见、效率高、成本低以及可进行个性化设置的优势。在电子问卷开发初期,应注意提供友好的程序界面、梳理操作流程,并提出调查报告的需求方案。今后的满意度调查工作,应朝着数据来源广、信息化水平高、结果针对性强的方向持续改进。Objective In order to provide reference for improving the satisfaction survey work, we explore the advantages of the electronic questionnaire survey in the patients' satisfaction. Methods Investigate the satisfaction of 750 patients ran-domly selected, using paper questionnaires and the e-questionnaires respectively, and compare the results collected. Re-sults The differences resulting from test results of two types of surveys in the satisfaction and collection of outpatients ' opinions were statistically significant (P〈0.01). Conclusion Comparing with paper questionnaires, electronic questionnaires have better authenticity in results and can collect outpatients' opinions more effectively, as well as higher efficiency, lower cost and personalized settings. At the beginning of the e-questionnaire designing, attention should be paid to providing friendly program interface, carding process, and demanding surveys scheme will be put forward. In the future, investing in satisfaction should be improved to wider data sources, higher level in information and better contribution.
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80