检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省成都市第五人民医院呼吸科,四川成都611130
出 处:《中国药业》2015年第B11期199-200,共2页China Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:目的探讨对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者采用综合康复护理措施对改善其肺功能的效果。方法选取医院收治的老年COPD患者84例作为研究对象,按护理模式分为对照组和观察组,各42例,其中对照组护理模式为常规护理,观察组为综合康复护理,对比两组肺功能改善效果。结果两组护理前用肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV,)以及FEV1/FVC对比无显著性差异(P〉0.05),护理后观察组FVC为(2.64±0.54)L,FEVl为(1.91±0.42)L,FEV1/FVC为(68.82±9.50)%,明显优于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论综合康复护理措施可有效改善老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺功能,进而改善其生活质量,值得推广。Objective To investigate the elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with comprehensive rehabilitation nursing measures to improve the effects of lung function.Methods Select our hospital in 84 elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients as the research object,according to the nursing mode is divided into control group and observation group,42 cases,of which the control for conventional nursing,nursing mode for comprehensive rehabilitation nursing observation group,compared two groups of lung function improvement.Results The two groups before nursing FVC,FEV1,FEVJFVC contrast no difference (P 〉 0.05) ,observation group after nursing FVC (2.64±0.54)L,FEV1(1.91±0.42)L,FEVl/FVC (68.82±9.50)%, contrast was better than control group,significant difference(P 〈 0.05).Conclusion Comprehensive rehabilitation nursing intervention can effectively improve the elderly with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,lung function and improve their quality of life,is worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28