传统与微创手术治疗小儿斜疝疗效及安全性对比研究  

The Comparative Study on Efficacy and Safety between Traditional Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery in Treating Infant Hernia

作　　者：靳军[1] 

机构地区：[1]随州市妇幼保健院儿外科,随州441300

出　　处：《数理医药学杂志》2016年第3期337-338,共2页Journal of Mathematical Medicine

摘　　要：目的：探究传统手术和微创手术治疗小儿斜疝的疗效,并对其安全性作出对比分析.方法：将某院自2013年6月-2015年6月期间收治的98例小儿斜疝患者,分成实验组（49例）和对照组（49例）,实验组患者行微创手术,对照组患者行传统手术,对比两组患儿平均手术时间、平均出血量、平均住院时间以及并发症发生情况.结果：实验组患者临床总有效率为98.00%,明显优于对照组71.43%,P 〈0.05;实验组患儿平均住院时间短、平均手术时间短、手术出血量少,优于对照组,P 〈0.0001;实验组患者并发症发生率低于对照组,两组差异对比有意义,P 〈0.01.结论：微创手术治疗小儿斜疝住院时间短,手术时间短,出血量少,安全性高,值得广泛推广与应用.Objective: To investigate the effect of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery in treating the children with indirect inguinal hernia,and make comparative analysis of their safety. Methods: 98 cases of infant hernia received by a hospital from June 2013 to June 2015 were divided into experimental group( 49 cases) and control group( 49 cases). The experimental group were treated by minimally invasive surgery,while the control group were under traditional surgery. Compare the mean operate time,mean estimated blood loss,mean hospitalization time and complications between two groups. Results: The total effective rate in experimental group is 98%,significantly superior to the control group( 71. 43%,P < 0. 05). The experimental group showed improvement in mean hospitalization time,mean operate time and mean estimated blood loss than the control group( P < 0. 0001). And the complications in experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group( P < 0. 001). Conclusion: The minimally invasive surgery in infant hernia has advantages of short hospitalization time,operate time and high safety,which is worthy of popularization and wide application.

关 键 词：传统手术 微创手术 小儿斜疝 

分 类 号：R726.5[医药卫生—儿科]