检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院北京协和医学院医药生物技术研究所,北京100050
出 处:《药学研究》2016年第2期63-66,共4页Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金课题(No.81273553);北京协和医学院2015年研究生创新基金(No.2015-1007-18)
摘 要:目的通过优化CCK-8的实验条件,提高检测药物影响肿瘤细胞增殖的敏感性和可靠性。方法以人肺癌A549细胞和白血病Molt-4细胞为研究对象,CCK-8法和MTT法分别检测细胞增殖的变化,并与Coulter细胞计数法和克隆形成率法进行比较。结果在相同的细胞数下,CCK-8法的检测灵敏度明显高于MTT法。以细胞密度1 000个/孔接种,抗肿瘤药物多柔比星处理96 h后,CCK-8法检测到的变化与克隆形成率法相当。分析Molt-4悬浮细胞发现:CCK-8法与Coulter细胞计数法的检测灵敏度无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论优化实验条件后,CCK-8法是一种灵敏度高、可靠性良好的细胞增殖检测方法。Objective To optimize the experiment condition and increase the reliability and sensibility of CCK- 8method in detecting the proliferation of tumor cells by drugs. Methods The proliferations of A549 and Molt- 4 cells were detected by CCK- 8 and MTT method,respectively. Meanwhile the sensitivity and accuracy were compared to cloning formation assay and Coulter cytometer. Results The sensitivity of CCK- 8 assay was significantly higher than that of MTT assay at the same cell density. The reliability of CCK- 8 was equivalent to the efficiency of clone formation assay when the cell density was seeded at 1 000 per well and treated with doxorubicin for 96 h. There were no significant differences in sensitivity and reliability of CCK- 8 and Coulter cytometer assay on suspension cells( P > 0. 05). Conclusion CCK- 8 is a kind of good assay for cell viability with a higher sensitivity and reliability during improved experiment conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.43.15