“单扩法”气囊仿生助产与自然分娩临床效果比较  

Comparison of the clinical effect between bionic air-bag midwifery by single expansion method and natural delivery

作　　者：姚娟娟[1] 董林红[1] 邓月桂[1] 蒙朝霞[1] 覃莹莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西中医药大学第一附属医院产科,南宁530023

出　　处：《中国临床新医学》2016年第2期119-121,共3页CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE

摘　　要：目的探讨在自然分娩过程中使用"单扩法"气囊仿生助产术的临床疗效。方法将符合纳入标准的80例产妇随机分为观察组和对照组各40例,观察组在宫口开大≥5 cm时采用"单扩法"气囊仿生助产术助产,对照组采取自然分娩。记录比较两组产妇的产程时间、分娩方式、会阴情况、产后出血情况及新生儿窒息率。结果观察组第一产程、第二产程及总产程时间均短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组产妇产后2 h内平均出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组分娩方式、会阴情况及新生儿窒息率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 "单扩法"气囊仿生助产术可以明显缩短产程时间,降低并发症发生率,对母婴无不良影响,值得临床应用推广。Objective To explore the clinical effect of a bionic air-bag midwifery skill by single expansion method in delivery. Methods Eighty puerperae in accordance with the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into the observation group（ n = 40） and the control group （n = 40 ）. The bionic air-bag midwifery skill by single expansion method was used in the observation group when the cervix was dilated ≥5 cm. The duration of labor, delivery modes, perineum conditions, amount of postpartum hemorrhage and the rate of neonatal asphyxia were compared between the two groups. Results The time of the first, second stage and the total labor duration in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group（ P 〈 0. 05 ）. The amount of postpartum hemorrhage in the observation group within 2 h was significantly less than that in the control group （P 〈 0. 05 ）. There were no significant differences in delivery modes, perineum conditions and the rate of neonatal asphyxia between the two groups （ P 〉 0.05 ）. Con- dusion The bionic air-bag midwifery by single expansion method can shorten the laboring time and reduce the related complications during parturition.

关 键 词：单扩法 气囊仿生助产 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R714[医药卫生—妇产科学]