检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚明杰[1] 刘侃[2] 张磊[1] 闫飚[1] 邹嘉平[1] 李伟忠[1]
机构地区:[1]南通大学医学院附属无锡第三人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,江苏无锡214000 [2]潍坊医学院附属平度人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,山东平度266700
出 处:《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》2016年第1期70-73,共4页Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
摘 要:目的探讨比较冷器械切除+缝合术、单极电凝切除术、等离子射频术三种不同手术方法切除扁桃体的疗效。方法将扁桃体切除术患者分为三组,冷器械切除+缝合术(A组)65例;单极电凝切除术(B组)40例;等离子射频切除术(C组)38例。记录扁桃体切除手术总时间、术中出血量、疼痛评分,术后复查时观察扁桃体白膜状况。结果 A、B、C三组的平均手术时间分别为58.8 min、27.0 min、23.7 min;术中平均出血量分别为34.2 m L、16.1 m L、12.5 m L;术后3 h和术后第1天的疼痛评分之间,差异均有统计学意义。结论与冷器械切除+缝合术和单极电凝切除术相比,等离子射频术切除扁桃体费用较高,但其手术时间短,术中出血量少,术后疼痛程度小。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of cold dissection, monopolar diathermy dissection and radiofre- quency ablation in tonsillectomy. Methods Patients undergone tonsillectomy were divided into 3 groups: cold dissec- tion + suture group (group A, n = 65 ), unipolar electric coagulation resection group (group B, n = 40 ), plasma radiofrequency resection group (group C, n = 38). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pain score, and postoperative albuginea of all groups were recorded and compared. Results The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group A, B and C were (58.8, 27.0 and 23.7) min, (34.2, 16.1 and 12.5) mL, respectively. There was significant difference in postoperative pain score 3 hour and 1 day after surgery. Conclusion Compared with cold dissection and monopolar diathermy dissection, radiofrequency ablation is more expansive, but it needs shorter operation time and causes less intraoperafive bleeding and pain.
分 类 号:R766.9[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.211