检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林铁军[1]
出 处:《政法论丛》2016年第1期145-153,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law
摘 要:中国古代审案官员司法调查成制于秦汉,秦汉爰书的相关记载可以成为现代法官调查权研究的溯源之本。爰书内容全面反映了秦汉审案官员司法调查以被告人口供、控告人陈述为中心、注重对被告人品格证据的调查以及详查细勘获取客观性证据等特点。这些特点经后世演进、改良,形成彰显中华法系特色的司法制度。至今,古代司法调查权的某些特点仍明典于律文或暗行于实践。通过对古代审案官员司法调查权的研究,可发掘现今法官调查权存在问题之成因,亦能为完善法官调查权提供制度之借鉴。Ancient Chinese judicial investigation became a system in the Qin and Han dynasties, and we can research the origin of the ancient power of judicial investigation according to the record of Qin and Han Dynasty. Comprehensive record reflects ancient judicial officials investigating the defendant confessions, focusing on the defendant character evidence investigation and detailed investigation of the survey to obtain objective evidence of fine features. These characteristics improved by later generations, highlighting the Chinese legal system characteristic form of justice. Through research and analysis about the ancient judicial officials investigation, we can explore the causes of the current problems of the judicial investigation, and also to provide a reference for the improvement of the system of judicial investigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.94.230