检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省南通市第二人民医院血液净化中心,江苏南通226002
出 处:《吉林医学》2016年第2期462-464,共3页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察ICU无肝素化血液净化的患者接受护理干预的效果及安全性。方法:将72例ICU重症患者的临床资料做详细整理及总结。按照所接受护理干预方式的不同将76例患者平均分为对照组与观察组,每组36例。两组患者均统一进行无肝素化血液净化治疗,护理人员对对照组患者实施一般护理干预,观察组患者在接受常规护理干预同时增加相关护理措施。比较两组总体治疗有效率。结果:对照组的总体有效率83.3%,远高于对照组的58.3%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对接受无肝素化血液净化的ICU患者增加相关有效地护理干预,其治疗效果远超出采用常规护理干预方式,应当在临床上推广使用。Objective To observe the ICU patients without heparinization blood purification accept nursing intervention,efficacy,and safety. Method The clinical data of 72 cases of ICU patients with severe do sorting and summary in detail. 76 patients were accepted in accordance with the different way of nursing intervention they were divided into control group and observation group,36 cases in each group. Two groups of patients were unified to no heparinization blood purification treatment,nursing staff to the control group,general nursing intervention for the observation group of patients undergoing routine nursing intervention at the same time given the relevant nursing measures. Total treatment efficiency of two groups was compared. Results in the control group total effective rate was 83. 3%,far higher than the control group total effective rate was 58. 3%,comparing the two groups had significant difference( P〈0. 05). Conclusion To accept no heparinization blood purification of ICU patients increase related effective nursing intervention,the treatment effects far beyond the conventional nursing intervention mode,should be used widely in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171