检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯志伟[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院,重庆401120
出 处:《中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第1期131-137,共7页Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金2014年青年项目"清王朝涉藏重大案件处理程序研究"(项目编号:14CFX057);中国法学会2013年度部级课题"清朝涉藏民刑案件研究"(项目编号:CLS(2013)C89)阶段成果
摘 要:经过了千年司法实践,到清朝时,藏区纠纷处理程序规范日趋完善,总体上形成了包括起诉、调解、审判、执行在内的纠纷解决程序和制度。处理程序的多重规范性和强制力,裁决主体的权威性,以及调解和经济赔偿的运用,都是其中的亮点。纠纷处理程序规范的实施,不仅便利纠纷解决,促进了清代藏区秩序稳定,而且对于当前在依法治国背景下,如何处理国家法与习惯法的互动关系,也有所启示。Through a thousand years of judicial practice, Tibetan dispute settlement procedure had been gradually improved before the Qing Dynasty, setting up a comprehensive procedure and system including: prosecution, mediation, trial and execution. The advantages of the procedure were multi-normative and coercive power, the authority of the ruling body, and the use of mediation and economic compensation. The implementation of this procedure not only facilitated dispute settlement and promote stability of the Tibetan-inhibited areas in the Qing dynasty, but also can provide inspirations for dealing with the interaction between the State law and the customary law under the current situation of ruling the country according to law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171