《文心雕龙》建安三曹论评议  

Comment on the Three Caos' Contributions Written in the Book of Wen Xin Diao Long

作　　者：蒋凡[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中文系,上海200433

出　　处：《赣南师范学院学报》2016年第1期99-105,共7页Journal of Gannan Teachers' College(Social Science(2))

摘　　要：刘勰在《文心雕龙》中论三曹,多成为后世评论三曹文学贡献的理论根据,多有可资学习借鉴之处。刘勰对三曹作品的批评,系将其安放到整个文学演变的历史长河中去做动态的具体考察;对于曹操的文学成就,刘勰并无故意贬抑的偏见,但由于时代的影响,其对于曹操文学存在某些认识不足之处;关于丕、曹兄弟文学,刘勰认为应将政治地位等因素加以排除,这有其合理性,刘勰肯定曹丕乐府诗的特定贡献,认为其理论建树优于曹植,而在诗文创作方面,则给予曹植"独冠群才"的高度评价,都是合乎实际的。In the Book of Wen Xin Diao Long,Liu Xie gave comments on the three Caos,Cao Cao,Cao Pi and Cao Zhi,contribution to the literature which served as the theoretical basis for the later comments. Liu Xie gave a concrete comment on the Cao＇s literal works undr the changing history of the whole literature and didn＇t think highly of Cao Cao＇s literal works. Except fo political factors,Liu Xie thought Cao Pi＇s literal works proper and definite contrubution to the Yuefu poems. Liu Xie regarded Cao Zhi as the best of the three.

关 键 词：文心雕龙 刘勰 曹操 曹植 曹丕 

分 类 号：I207.62[文学—中国文学]