检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院
出 处:《理论与现代化》2016年第1期95-101,共7页Theory and Modernization
摘 要:法治话语是法治思维的最直接表现,而且也是法治方式的最集中体现。新中国成立后至今的历史时期,在官方的意识形态中出现了不同的法治话语,述说着中国法治发展的不同状态。法治在中国经历了一个从孕育、生发到成熟与完善的过程,反映出来的是法治在中国于肯定和否定之间的往返流转以及建构法治话语体系的异常艰辛。中国法治话语体系来之不易,是社会发展的必然要求,具有历史必然性,是历史规律性和合目的性的统一。The legal discourse is the most direct expression of legal thinking and the most concentrated expression of the rule of law means. There are different legal discourse in the official ideology since 1949, which recount the different state of development of Chinese law. The rule of law in China has experienced a process from aphasia, nurture, grow to maturity and perfection, which reflects the rule of law in China to transfer back and forth between positive and negative, and the abnormal hardships to build a legal system. Chinese hard-won system of legal discourse is the inevitable requirement of social development. It is the unity of historical regularity and purpose and bases on the historical inevitability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15