中美空军飞行学员医学选拔对照实证研究——神经精神系统疾病  被引量:5

An empirical study on medical selection of flying cadets with nervous and mental system diseases between PLAAF and USAF

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李文平[1] 邹志康[1] 石进[1] 陈雪涛[1] 王健[1] 王姮[1] 马中立[1] 

机构地区:[1]空军总医院招飞体检队,北京100142

出  处:《军事医学》2016年第2期88-91,共4页Military Medical Sciences

基  金:全军后勤科研"十二五"重大项目(AKJ11J003)

摘  要:目的对比中美空军招收飞行学员医学选拔标准中神经精神系统部分的异同点,为我军飞行学员医学选拔标准的修改提出合理建议。方法统计2012~2015年招飞医学选拔定选中进行神经内科检查的学员,并将不合格学员参比美军标准重新进行分类。结果因神经内科体检不合格的学员共123名,占总人数的1.1%,但参比美军标准重新进行分类后,不合格人数为13人,占10.6%,合格人数为24人,占19.5%,其余86人需进一步检查以明确,占69.9%;两个标准的淘汰率具有显著性差异(P〈0.001)。结论中美招飞医学选拔标准中神经精神系统部分具有一定的差异,在标准修订时可适当借鉴美军标准。Objective To compare the medical selection standards of flying cadets in the nervous and mental system between Air Force of PLA(PLAAF) and the US Air Force( USAF), and to offer suggestions on revising PLAAF medical standards for flying cadets. Methods All our candidates who had participated in tile final medical selection of flying cadets were subjected to neurological examinations, and determined as qualified or not according to USAF Medical Standards Directory. Results 123 people were disqualified during the neurological examination, accounting for 1.1% of the total. According to USAF Medical Standards Directory, 13 of them were disqualified, 24 of them were qualified, and 86 of them needed a second examination. There was marked difference between disqualification rates of PLAAF and USAF. Conclusion There are some differences in medical selection standards for flying cadets in the nervous and mental system between PLAAF and USAF, and we could revise PLAAF standards using USAF standards for reference.

关 键 词:飞行学员 医学选拔 神经精神系统 实证研究 体格检查 

分 类 号:R851.3[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学] R74[医药卫生—临床医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象