检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李文平[1] 邹志康[1] 石进[1] 陈雪涛[1] 王健[1] 王姮[1] 马中立[1]
出 处:《军事医学》2016年第2期88-91,共4页Military Medical Sciences
基 金:全军后勤科研"十二五"重大项目(AKJ11J003)
摘 要:目的对比中美空军招收飞行学员医学选拔标准中神经精神系统部分的异同点,为我军飞行学员医学选拔标准的修改提出合理建议。方法统计2012~2015年招飞医学选拔定选中进行神经内科检查的学员,并将不合格学员参比美军标准重新进行分类。结果因神经内科体检不合格的学员共123名,占总人数的1.1%,但参比美军标准重新进行分类后,不合格人数为13人,占10.6%,合格人数为24人,占19.5%,其余86人需进一步检查以明确,占69.9%;两个标准的淘汰率具有显著性差异(P〈0.001)。结论中美招飞医学选拔标准中神经精神系统部分具有一定的差异,在标准修订时可适当借鉴美军标准。Objective To compare the medical selection standards of flying cadets in the nervous and mental system between Air Force of PLA(PLAAF) and the US Air Force( USAF), and to offer suggestions on revising PLAAF medical standards for flying cadets. Methods All our candidates who had participated in tile final medical selection of flying cadets were subjected to neurological examinations, and determined as qualified or not according to USAF Medical Standards Directory. Results 123 people were disqualified during the neurological examination, accounting for 1.1% of the total. According to USAF Medical Standards Directory, 13 of them were disqualified, 24 of them were qualified, and 86 of them needed a second examination. There was marked difference between disqualification rates of PLAAF and USAF. Conclusion There are some differences in medical selection standards for flying cadets in the nervous and mental system between PLAAF and USAF, and we could revise PLAAF standards using USAF standards for reference.
关 键 词:飞行学员 医学选拔 神经精神系统 实证研究 体格检查
分 类 号:R851.3[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学] R74[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.231