检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省荣成市西城区社区卫生服务中心,山东264300
出 处:《当代医学》2016年第7期96-97,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的为比较肛裂切除+闭式括约肌松解术和肛裂切除+开放括约肌松解术的临床疗效。方法将130例Ⅱ~Ⅲ期肛裂患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各65例。治疗组采用肛裂切除+闭式括约肌松解术,对照组采用肛裂切除+开放括约肌松解术。结果治疗组术后疼痛、愈合时间和并发症均低于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论肛裂切除+闭式括约肌松解术治疗Ⅱ~Ⅲ期肛裂术后疼痛轻,恢复快,并发症少。Objective To compare the anal fissure excision plus closed muscle release and anal fissure excision + open muscle release for the clinical curative effect. Methods 130 cases of patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ anal fissure were randomLy divided into treatment group and control group, treatment group with anal fissure excision plus closed sphincter loose solution, control group adopts the anal fissure excision + open sphincter loose solution. Results According to the treatment group in postoperative pain, healing time and complications were lower than control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The treatment of anal fissure excision plus closed sphincter loose solution Ⅱ-Ⅲ period anal fissure postoperative pain is light, rapid recovery, fewer complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.172.58