检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李继高[1]
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学历史系,博士研究生上海200241
出 处:《中共党史研究》2016年第2期93-100,共8页CPC History Studies
摘 要:从1955年开始,"中国差别"的存废问题成为英美及其巴统盟国外交争论的焦点。为缓和对华贸易管制,尤其是对华差别禁运,英国持续不断地给美国施加压力。美国不仅一再推迟讨论,而且坚持保留对华差别禁运。这让英国逐渐丧失了与美国就缓和对华贸易管制达成一致的希望,并于1957年单边废除"中国差别"政策。通过梳理"中国差别"废除的过程可以发现,英国的立场在巴统内部具有领导垂范作用,也最为美国看重。因此,英国是废除"中国差别"政策最有力的推动者与执行者。同时,英美同盟关系和国家利益的复杂性也在这一经济分裂过程中得到了充分体现。Since 1955, keeping " China Differential" or not has become a bone of contention in diplomacy between Britain and America and their COCOM allies. In order to relax the trade control over China, especially to eliminate tighter embargo against China than Soviet Bloc, Britain continuously put great pressure on America. America not only repeatedly postponed the discussion on it, but also insisted on the difference of embargo between China and Soviet Bloc. This made Britain gradually lost the hope for reaching agreement with America on the re- laxation of trade control over China until Britain unilaterally removed " China Differential" policy in 1957. Through sorting out the process of abolishing "China Differential", it concludes that British positions took a lead- ing part in COMCOM inside, and also were most valued by America. Therefore, Britain was the most powerful promoter and enforcer abolishing "China Differential". At the same time, the complexity of Anglo-American alli- ance and national interests has been fully embodied in this process of economic split.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3