债权意思主义:特殊动产的物权变动模式  

Intentionalism of Creditor's Rights:Real Right Transfer Pattern of Special Personal Property

作　　者：赵磊[1] 曹亚雅 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120 [2]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《太原师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期45-48,共4页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：《物权法》第二十四条没有明确规定特殊动产物权变动的生效要件。学术界和实务界对第二十四条的解释几乎皆立足于交付生效的立场,这样的论证虽然坚持了债权形式主义的原则,却忽略了债权意思主义这一例外。基于《物权法》第二十四条的可解释性、《物权法》对债权意思主义确立的统一性以及比较法中债权意思主义的实质性,可以作出这样的解释:《物权法》第二十四条是债权形式主义的例外,其确立了特殊动产债权意思主义的物权变动模式。The article 24 of ＂Real Right Law＂ does not explicitly stipulate the requirement of validity in transfer of special personal property. Both academics and practitioners base their stand on validity on delivery in their explanation of this article. The arguments adhere to the principle of formalism of creditor＇s right,but they neglect the exception of intentionalism of creditor＇s rights. Based on the interpretability of article 24 of ＂Real Right Law＂,the uniformity established for intentionalism of creditor＇s rights in ＂ Real Right Law ＂ and materiality of the intentionalism of creditor＇s rights in the comparative law can be explained as follows： Article 24 of the ＂Real Right Law＂ is an exception of formalism of creditor＇s right, and it has established the real right transfer pattern of special personal property by intentionalism of creditor＇s rights.

关 键 词：特殊动产 债权意思主义 登记对抗 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]