检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐富明[1] 李欧[1] 邓颖[1] 刘程浩[1] 吴修良[1]
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079
出 处:《应用心理学》2015年第4期325-333,共9页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571083)
摘 要:本研究从评价倾向框架(ATF)的角度探讨了情绪的确定性维度对风险偏好的影响。实验一发现,高确定性情绪(愤怒、愉悦)导致较高的风险寻求,低确定性情绪(恐惧)导致较低的风险寻求,确定性评价倾向在其中起部分中介作用,说明不同情绪在核心评价主题上(并不是效价上)的差异决定了情绪对决策的影响,实验一还证实不同情绪对决策的影响是通过评价倾向实现的。实验二发现,在任务风险确定时,愤怒情绪比恐惧情绪导致了更高的风险寻求;在任务风险不确定时,愤怒与恐惧被试的风险寻求倾向没有差异,说明情绪的确定性维度与风险任务的确定性属性之间存在交互作用,当两者的方向不一致时,情绪所激发的评价倾向可能会受到任务风险性质的抑制。In this study,an appraisal-tendency framework( ATF) was adopted to analyze the influence of specific emotion on risk preference. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that individuals under the emotions associated with high certainty( anger and happy) showed higher risk-seeking tendency. In contrast,individuals under the emotions associated with low certainty( fear) showed lower risk-seeking tendency. In other words,the difference in core appraisal theme of emotion,not the value,played a key role in the influence on risk preference. Further,a partial mediating effect of appraisal-tendency was verified in the relation between emotion and risk preference. Experiment 2 indicated that the interaction of emotion's certainty and task risk was significant. Specifically,when the task risk was certain,individuals with anger emotion( high certainty) showed higher risk-seeking tendency than the ones with fear emotion( low certainty). However,when the risk was uncertain,there was no difference about risk preference between the two conditions. Results suggested the appraisal-tendency inspired by emotion would be restrained by the risk of task,if both directions of emotion's certainty and risk task did not match.
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117