检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江门市新会区中医院骨二科,广东江门529100
出 处:《现代临床护理》2015年第11期60-62,共3页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的设计并制作带轨道医用床罩式床单,并观察其使用效果。方法设计并制作带轨道医用床罩式床单,选择30名护士,每人均分别采用传统的铺床法和采用带轨道医用床罩式床单进行铺床,分别计算其铺床时间,同时了解患者满意度和测量床单需要的布料。结果传统铺床法所需床单布料面积为(5.1±0.3)㎡,护士铺床时间为(2.1±0.1)min,患者满意度评分为(7.2±1.0)分;带轨道的医用床罩式床单所需布料面积为(2.4±0.2)㎡,护士铺床时间为(0.9±0.1)min,患者满意度评分为(8.5±1.2)分,两种方法比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论带轨道医用床罩式床单进行铺床,能有效缩短护士铺床时间,节省布料成本,制作简单,可操作性强,增加患者的舒适度,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore design and make a bed sheet with bed cover style for medical use. Method Thirty nurses were selected to make the bed by traditional bed sheet and new bed sheet with track respectively. The times of making bed by different bed sheet were compared. Results The cloth area of traditional bed sheet was(5.1 ± 0.3)m^2, time of making bed was(2.1 ± 0.1)min and patients satisfaction score was(7.2 ± 1.0); the cloth area of new bed sheet with track was(2.4 ± 0.2)m^2, time of making bed was(0.9 ± 0.1) min and patients satisfaction score was(8.5 ± 1.2). There were significance between the two methods in the time of making the beds, the cloth area and patients′ satisfaction(P〈0.001). Conclusion The use of new bed sheet with track can save time of making bed, reduce the expense of cloth and improve patients′ comfort, so it is worthy of being applied in clinical wards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.27.229