检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈璐旸
机构地区:[1]上海知识产权法院知产二庭
出 处:《电子知识产权》2016年第2期89-93,共5页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:面对企业名称与商标之间冲突产生的两个难题:一是当事人以在后注册商标侵犯其在先登记企业名称权为由起诉时,如何应对并切实保护在先合法权益;二是当企业名称与驰名商标产生冲突时,企业名称如何避让驰名商标。应从具体案例着手,并从法律、法理、学说等不同角度寻求解决方向和路径,即逐渐放开在先企业名称与注册商标冲突时侵权者责任承担的形式,妥善运用联想理论对驰名商标权利人的合法权益予以保护。There are two problems between enterprise name and trademark conflict: one is concerning that when parties prosecute because of registered trademark infringing the earlier registered enterprise name right, how to deal with and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of earlier; The second is how to avoid the well-known trademark when the enterprise name conflicts with well-known trademark and enterprise name. We should find out directions and paths to solutions from the specific cases in hand, and from different angles the of laws, legal principles, and theories. Furthermore, we shall gradually liberalize forms of infringer liability when prior registered enterprise name and trademark conflict, and properly use the association theory to protect well-known trademark obligee's legitimate rights and interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222