检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅医院药学部,长沙410008 [2]中南大学药学院,长沙410013 [3]桂林医学院药学院,广西桂林541001
出 处:《中国药房》2016年第8期1030-1032,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:为Ⅰ类切口手术围术期合理预防使用抗菌药物提供参考。方法:随机抽取某"三甲"医院2013年3月-2015年2月Ⅰ类切口手术患者4 201例,对Ⅰ类切口手术围术期预防使用抗菌药物进行回顾性分析。结果:在4 201例Ⅰ类切口手术患者中,预防使用抗菌药物2 399例(占57.10%)。预防使用抗菌药物以头孢菌素、β-内酰胺类/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂为主,分别占45.60%、19.76%;头孢唑林、头孢曲松、阿莫西林钠克拉维酸钾的使用频次位于前3名。其中,预防用药时机不适宜的频数为823(占34.31%),预防用药疗程>48 h的频数为855(占35.64%)。结论:该院Ⅰ类切口手术围术期预防使用抗菌药物不合理情况仍然存在,应加强抗菌药物的监管,定期进行抗菌药物合理使用专题讲座学习,以促进抗菌药物的临床合理使用。OBJECTIVE:To provide reference for perioperative rational prophylactic application of antibacterials in type Ⅰ incision operation. METHODS:4 201 patients underwent type Ⅰ incision operation were collected from a class A grade three hospital during Mar. 2013-Feb. 2015. The perioperative prophylactic application of antibacterials in type Ⅰ incision operation were analyzed statistically. RESULTS:Of 4 201 patients underwent type Ⅰ incision operation,there were 2 399 cases of prophylactic application of antibiotics(accounting for 57.10%). Cephalosporins and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor were the main classes of antibacterials for preventive use,accounting for 45.60% and 19.76%,respectively. The frequency of using cefazolin,ceftriaxone and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid ranked the top 3 places,among which there was 823 cases of unsuitable prophylactic medication time(34.31%),and 855 cases of prophylactic medication time〉 48 h(accounting for 35.64%). CONCLUSIONS:There still is unreasonable perioperative prophylactic application of antibacterials in type Ⅰ incision operation in this hospital. It is necessary to strengthen the supervision of antibacterials and conduct regular rational antibacterials use seminars in order to promote rational use of antibacterials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3