论西方公共行政改革背景下“问责”的转向与趋势  

On the Diversion and Trends of “Accountability” in the Western Public Administrative Reform

作　　者：胡春艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学公共管理学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第2期159-165,172,共8页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年资助项目(71303262);"十二五"湖南省重点学科资助项目(湘教发[2011]76号)

摘　　要：为了追求"良好的"政府治理目标,西方公共行政经历了传统公共行政、新公共管理和后新公共管理的变迁,这些改革深刻地改变了政府与市场、公民社会之间的相互关系,"问责"随之发生了一系列变化:较早的传统公共行政侧重"规则和程序"的问责,新公共管理注重以"市场"为中心的问责,后新公共管理则注重"多中心网络"的问责。在不同的问责模式下,问责的标准、问责的行动者、问责的方式出现了不同的特征。In pursuit of good governance,the western public administrative reform has gone through great changes from traditional public administration,new public management to post-new public management,and transformed the relationships among government,markets and civil societies,which has brought about a string of changes of accountability-the traditional public administration put emphasis on“rule and procedure ” accountability, the new public management focused on“market-centered ” accountability, and the post-new public management was concerned with “multi-centric network”accountability.In different models,the standards,actors and ways of accountability take on varied features.

关 键 词：传统公共行政 新公共管理 后新公共管理 问责 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]