检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084 [2]北京师范大学社会发展与公共政策学院,北京100875
出 处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第1期87-94,124,共9页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目"城市化进程中新生代农民工职业教育与社会融合问题研究"(项目编号:10JZD0044)
摘 要:本研究将"90后"农民工社会资本的积累过程置于中国人口流动这一大背景之下加以考察,通过对在5省调查收集的500余份问卷数据的分析,刻画了"90后"农民工童年时代父母对其生活抚育和教育安排的主要策略类型。通过多元线性回归模型,探讨了童年时代不同家庭策略对成年后社会资本的影响。研究发现,亲子团聚的家庭策略对于"90后"农民工社会资本的正向影响最大,其中又以童年曾有"城市流动双系抚育"经历的子女的社会资本存量最高;研究还发现,出生地会对"90后"农民工的社会资本产生显著影响。This article studies the accumulation of social capital of migrant workers born in the 1990s under the social background of Chinese rural-urban migration. Based on a survey of 511 samples in 5 provinces,five key types of childrearing and education strategies in the young migrants' childhood are identified. A multiple linear regression model has been adopted to study how different family strategies in their childhood impacted accumulation of social capital in early adulthood. The result shows the childrearing type by both parents impacts the social capital accumulation positively compared with the parents-children separation type, which demonstrates the key role of parents in their children's accumulation of social capital; more importantly, compared with other types, the childrearing type by both parents in the cities has significant positive influence on children's social capital when they grow up.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42