中国农村集体经营性建设用地入市改革研究——以贵州湄潭农村集体经济经营性建设用地拍卖案为例  

Reform of Rural Collective Management's Construction Land into Market——Taking Meitan, Guizhou as Example

作　　者：张玉梅[1] 王子柱[2] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学经济学院,河北保定071002 [2]河北大学图书馆,河北保定071002

出　　处：《改革与战略》2016年第3期69-73,135,共6页Reformation & Strategy

基　　金：国家社科基金"房地产调控政策的影响及其效应研究"(项目编号:12BJY053);教育部中西部高校提升综合实力工程项目"环首都经济圈与河北经济发展";河北省社会科学民生调研课题"农村集体经营性建设用地入市改革问题研究"(项目编号:201501105);保定市社科规划课题"保定农村土地流转金融服务研究"(项目编号:201501002)

摘　　要：2015年8月27日,中国农村集体经营性建设用地"第一槌"在贵州湄潭县成功敲响。湄潭案例在土地出让、使用用途、平等入市和同权同价等方面突破了现有法律。文章认为,为深化农村集体经营性建设用地改革试点,首先需要不断优化入市土地、入市平台、入市方式、收益分配、后续服务等环节;其次在坚守改革底线的前提下加快村民自治建设,规范政府相关职能部门行为,遏制土地投机炒作,以防范和化解风险;最后站在系统论高度,处理好农村土地三项制度改革、地方政府和农村集体经济组织、入市和土地规划及产业发展的关系。August 27, 2015, ＂the first hammer＂ of China＇s rural collective management＇s construction land successfully sounded in Meitan County of Guizhou province. Meitan case breaks laws in land transfer, usage, equality into the market, equality in fight and price. To deep the rural management＇s collective construction land reform pilot, we first need to constantly optimize market sub-processes of land, market platform, market approach, profit distribution and follow-up services; secondly under the premise of stick to reform＇s bottom line, speeding up the construction of villager autonomy, regulate the behavior of the relevant government departments, curb land speculation, to prevent and mitigate risks; finally, standing on the height of the system, deal with the relationship between the three rural land systems reform, local government and rural collective economic organizations, market and land planning, industrial development.

关 键 词：农村集体经济经营性建设用地 出让 拍卖 村民自治 同权同价 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]