不同刺激模式下失语症命名能力的特征研究  

The Characteristics of Naming Abilities of Aphasic Patients under Different Stimulus Modes

作　　者：朱红[1,2,3] 范顺娟[1,2] 刘巧云[1,2] 丁珊珊[4] 郑钦[5] KIM Ha-kyung 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室,上海200062 [2]华东师范大学言语听觉康复科学系,上海200062 [3]辽宁特殊教育师范高等专科学校,沈阳110173 [4]上海市徐汇区中心医院康复科,上海200031 [5]上海市残疾人康复职业培训中心,上海200127

出　　处：《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》2016年第2期96-99,共4页Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目，言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室开放课题

摘　　要：目的考察不同类型失语症患者在不同刺激模式下的命名能力。方法采用自编的词语命名评估工具测评正常人与不同类型失语症患者的命名成绩，并进行统计分析。结果失语症患者在不同刺激模式下的命名能力均显著低于正常人（P〈0．01）。失语症患者的命名能力在视听继时刺激模式下最好，听觉刺激模式下最差。结论在失语症患者训练过程中可先采用视听继时刺激模式进行命名训练。Objective To study the naming abilities of different types of aphasic patients under different stimulus modes. Methods This research evaluated the naming abilities of normal persons and aphasic patients with the naming subtest of ＂aphasia assessment software system＂, which was invented by Dr. Huang Zhaoming and Dr. KIM Ha-kyung,etc.The results were statistically analyzed. Results Naming abilities of aphasic patients under different stimulus modes were significantly lower than those of normal persons（P〈0.01）. The naming ability of aphasic patients was the best under the listening before visual stimulus mode, and poorest under the only listening stimulus mode. Conclusion Therapists can use the listening before visual stimulus mode to treat aphasic patients at the beginning.

关 键 词：失语症 刺激模式 命名能力 实验研究 

分 类 号：R179[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]