中国大陆与台湾地区诽谤罪比较研究  

Comparative Research about Libel between Chinese Mainland and Chinese Taiwan

作　　者：张海梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安财经学院法学院,陕西西安710061

出　　处：《河北法学》2016年第4期50-62,共13页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：西安财经学院2014年科研基金项目<刑事损害赔偿制度的法律完善>(14JD14)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国大陆地区和台湾地区刑法规定的诽谤罪在犯罪构成特征、不罚事由、追诉模式等方面存在较大差异。大陆地区对诽谤罪的构成要件规定较为严格,要求必须有"捏造事实"的行为,而且必须"情节严重"才构成诽谤罪。台湾地区对诽谤罪的构成要件方面限制较少,不要求"捏造事实",也无"情节严重"之限制,而是更多地通过"真实的证明"、"善意发表言论"等不罚事由的规定来限制诽谤罪的处罚范围。大陆地区诽谤罪的追诉不是绝对的"告诉才处理",在严重危害社会秩序和国家利益的情况下可提起公诉。台湾地区诽谤罪属"告诉乃论"之罪,充分保障告诉权人的告诉选择权。台湾地区"告诉"可启动侦查程序,有利于解决告诉权人举证能力不足之难题。There are many differences about libel between Chinese Mainland and Chinese Taiwan on constitutional characteristic of crime, the subject of illegal negates,prosecution mode. Constitutional characteristic of libel must have ＂fabricated facts＂behavior,and must be ＂serious cases ＂ in Chinese Mainland. Constitutional characteristic of libel must have ＂fabricated facts＂behavior,and must be ＂serious cases＂in Chinese Mainland. Constitutional characteristic of libel does not require a＂fabricated facts＂,and the limit of ＂serious cases＂,but more through the ＂real proof＂,＂good speech＂and the subject of impunity provisions to limit the scope of libel penalties in Chinese Taiwan. libel prosecution is not absolute ＂no trial without complaint＂in the case of serious harm to public order and national interests can be prosecuted in Chinese Mainland. Libel is absolute ＂no trial without complaint＂in Chinese Taiwan., Complaint may start the investigation procedure to help the plaintiff find evidence in Chinese Taiwan

关 键 词：中国大陆与台湾地区 诽谤罪 比较 完善 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]