商环包皮切除术的疗效及安全性分析  

Analysis on curative effect and safety of Shang ring circumcision

作　　者：肖卫忠[1] 潘森[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆市涪陵中心医院泌尿外科,重庆408000

出　　处：《局解手术学杂志》2016年第3期202-204,共3页Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery

摘　　要：目的比较商环包皮切除术与传统包皮切除术的临床效果及手术安全性。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2015年5月于我院行包皮切除术的329例成年患者的临床资料,其中205例行商环包皮切除术,另外124例行传统包皮环切术,对比分析2组手术时间、术中及术后VAS疼痛评分、术中出血量、切口愈合时间、并发症以及阴茎外观满意度和总体满意度。结果商环包皮切除术在手术时间、术中出血量、术中及术后疼痛评分、总体并发症发生率、阴茎外观满意度及总体满意度上均明显优于传统包皮切除术,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与传统包皮切除术相比,商环包皮切除术具有更好的手术效果和较高的安全性,并能明显缩短手术时间,节约医疗成本。Objective To compare the curative effect and safety of Shang ring circumcision and conventional circumcision. Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 329 adult patients who were admitted into our hospital from January 2013 to May 2015,including205 cases of Shang ring circumcision and 124 cases of conventional circumcision. The operation time,intraoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores,intraoperative bleeding,wound healing time,complications,and degree of penile appearances and overall satisfaction between the two groups were compared. Results Compared with conventional circumcision,Shang ring circumcision was associated with shorter operative time,less intraoperative blood loss,lower intraoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores,lower adverse event rate,higher penile appearances and overall satisfaction,and the difference was statistically significant（ P〈0. 05）. Conclusion Shang ring circumcision may be a safer and more effective choice in comparison with conventional circumcision for male patients,as it can shorten the time of operation and save the cost of health care.

关 键 词：商环 包皮切除术 阴茎外观 满意度 

分 类 号：R699.8[医药卫生—泌尿科学]