检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学城市与区域科学学院,上海200434
出 处:《科技管理研究》2016年第5期227-232,共6页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目"实现2020年我国控制温室气体排放行动目标对策研究"(10AZD015);上海财经大学2012年研究生创新基金项目"碳减排约束下的我国产业转移路径研究"(CXJJ-2012-302)
摘 要:讨论已有研究在能源效率与能源消费关系上的分歧及成因,并指出传统能源回弹路径与中国情况的不合之处。通过构建新的逻辑分析框架,对中国能源效率提高影响能源消费的内在机理进行分析,并借助联立方程模型和经验数据对其影响方向和传导路径做出实证研究。得出结论,(1)中国能源效率提高影响能源消费的路径有两条,一是直接抑制,二是通过促进经济增长而间接拉动;(2)与发达国家不同,中国能源效率的提升并未降低能源价格和促进技术进步从而使能源消费回弹;(3)推动能源消费增长的主要因素是经济增长而非能效提高。This paper discusses the divergence about the effect of rising efficiency on the total energy consumption, and points out the differences between the traditional path of energy rebound effect and China~ fact. Based on the available liter- ature and serious comparison, the authors establish a new analytic framework to analyze the influence and conduct a path of energy efficiency on energy consumption, and then empirically test it by using the Simultaneous Equation Model and Chi- nese statistics during 1980--2011. According to the result, the conclusion can be drawn as follows: (1) Chinat energy ef- ficiency development reduced energy consumption directly, increased it by promoting economic growth indirectly, and the inhibitory effect was more than the promotional one; (2) Unlike the western countries, energy efficiency improvement in China did not cause the energy wastage bounce by promoting economic growth or decreasing the energy price; (3) The key factor increasing the usage of energy was economic development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249