新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用两种B-D测试法的监测效果对比  

Comparison of Monitoring Results of Two Kinds of B-D Test Methods for New High-Pressure Steam Sterilizer

作　　者：张裕娴 

机构地区：[1]深圳市儿童医院,广东深圳518038

出　　处：《临床医学工程》2016年第3期272-273,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering

摘　　要：目的对比新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用两种B-D测试法的监测效果。方法在脉动预真空压力蒸汽灭菌器测试时,分别使用一次性B-D测试包法及过程挑战装置法开展98锅次同步测试,且将两种方法对灭菌器漏气监测敏感度进行对比。结果通过对98锅次监测效果进行观察,发现一次性B-D测试包法监测没有发现漏气,而过程挑战装置法监测发现9次漏气,两种监测敏感度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),通过随后的灭菌器漏气测试发现该9次均存在漏气现象,表明过程挑战装置法监测敏感度比一次性B-D测试包法更显著。结论新高压蒸汽灭菌器应用有效且敏感的过程挑战装置法进行测试,可以弥补一次性B-D测试包无法监测的压力蒸汽灭菌器漏气问题,能保证灭菌器性能监测结果的精准性,值得推广。Objective To compare the monitoring results of two kinds of B-D test methods for new high-pressure steam sterilizer.Methods During the test of pulsing forevacuum steam sterilizer, disposable B-D test wrap method and process challenge device method were used to carry out 98 pots of time of synchronization testing. The sensitivity to monitoring leak of sterilizer of two methods was compared. Results Disposable B-D test wrap method was not found any leak, while the process challenge device method was found 9 times of leak confirmed by sterilizer leak test. The sensitivity of the two methods showed statistical difference（P〈0.05）, and the sensitivity of process challenge device method was more significant than that of B-D test wrap method. Conclusions Effective and sensitive process challenge device method for new high-pressure steam sterilizer can be used to make up for the problem that disposable B-D test wrap cannot monitor the leak of pressure steam sterilizer, so as to ensure the accuracy of performance monitoring results of sterilizer.

关 键 词：一次性B-D测试包 过程挑战装置 高压蒸汽灭菌器 监测效果 对比 敏感度 

分 类 号：R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]