检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈月琴[1] 舒斌[1] 朱臻[1] 白江迪 刘红妍[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江农林大学经济管理学院,浙江临安311300
出 处:《农林经济管理学报》2016年第1期31-38,共8页Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management
基 金:浙江省中央财政林业补贴试点社会经济效益监测项目(2045200148);东南亚环境经济项目(EEPSEA)
摘 要:林业补贴是发展林业的一项重要财政手段,而林业补贴能否影响农户的风险决策呢?基于2014年浙江省建德和开化92户农户调研数据,采用实验经济学方法测算农户风险态度即风险偏好程度,在此基础上,运用单因素分析法及序次Logit模型实证分析林业补贴对农户风险态度的影响。研究结果表明:在10%统计水平下,获得造林补贴农户处于高风险偏好程度的可能性是未获得造林补贴农户的2.46倍;相对于未获得抚育补贴农户,获得抚育补贴农户处于高风险偏好程度的可能性提高2.03倍。其他个体特征变量及家庭特征变量对农户的风险偏好程度均有影响。最后,基于研究结果提出政策建议,为政府决策提供借鉴。While forestry subsidy is an important financial means for the development of forestry,it remains a question whether forestry subsidies influence farmers' attitude to risks.This paper,based on the survey data of 92 farmers from Jiande and Kaihua County in Zhejiang Province,used experimental economics methods to calculate farmers' risk attitudes,or their degree of risk preference.On this basis,Ordered-Logit Model was adopted to empirically analyze the effects of forestry subsidies on farmers' risk attitudes.The results of the study show that in the 10% level of statistical,farmers with afforestation subsidies were 2.46 times more likely to find themselves with high risk preference than those who have not obtained the afforestation subsidies; similarly,the possibility of high risk preference has been increased by a factor of 2. 03 for farmers with tending subsidies compared to farmers without them.Other individual characteristics variables and family characteristics variables on farmers' risk preference degree all had some impact on farmers' risk preference.Finally,some policy suggestions were put forward to provide reference for government in decision-making.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3