咪达唑仑与右美托咪啶对照研究的回顾性分析  被引量:2

Retrospective report for the controlled trials of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:余志中[1] 许丹[1] 付朝晖[1] 

机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院西院ICU,武汉430056

出  处:《临床急诊杂志》2016年第2期124-127,共4页Journal of Clinical Emergency

摘  要:目的:收集2009~2015年发表的有关右美托咪啶与咪达唑仑之间随机对照研究进行分析,进一步验证右美托咪啶与咪达唑仑的镇静效果及对机械通气时间、ICU住院时间等的影响。方法:主要对PubMedmedline、ovid-embase、Cochrane Library进行检索,纳入标准为针对ICU成人患者使用右美托咪啶与咪达唑仑镇静治疗的随机对照试验。运用Review Manager 5.0软件进行统计分析,连续性变量采用加权均数差WMD及其95%CI表示,二分类变量资料采用相对危险度RR及其95%CI表示,率的比较采用方差倒数分析。结果:镇静目标达标时间百分比比较差异无统计学意义(WMD=0.03,95%CI:-0.01~0.07,P=0.1);右美托咪啶组能缩短机械通气时间(WMD=-32.35,95%CI:-46.41^-18.29,P<0.05);ICU住院时间更短(WMD=-40.82,95%CI:-43.10^-38.54,P<0.05);心动过缓发生率更高(RR=2.49,95%CI:1.79~3.46,P<0.05);低血压发生率比较差异无统计学意义(RR=1.20,95%CI:0.73~1.95,P=0.48)。结论:右美托咪啶能产生与咪达唑仑相同的镇静效果,同时缩短机械通气时间及ICU住院时间,但其产生心动过缓的不良反应也应予以关注。Objective:Analyze the randomized-controlled trials of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam that published between 2009 to 2015.And validate the two sedatives' efficacy,and the impact to duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay.Method:Studies were independently searched in Pubmed-medline、ovid-embase、and cochrane library.The randomized-controlled trials of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam were selected.Analysis was performed with Review Manager version 5.3.Continuous outcomes were demonstrated by the style of weight mean difference(WMD)with 95% confidence interval(CI).Then dichotomous outcomes were demonstrated by the style of risk ratio(RR)with 95%CI.Rate outcomes were demonstrated by the style of generic inverse variance.Result:There was no difference in percentage of time within the sedation target [WMD =0.03,95%CI(-0.01,0.07),P=0.1].In dexmedetomidine-treated patients,duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter[WMD=-32.35,95%CI(-46.41,-18.29),P〈0.05],the same as length of ICU stay[WMD=-40.82,95%CI(-43.10,-38.54),P〈0.05].But there was higher incidence of bradycardia [RR=2.49,95%CI(1.79,3.46),P〈0.05]while no difference in incidence of hypotension[RR=1.20,95%CI(0.73,1.95),P=0.48].Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine has the similar efficacy versus midazolam,while shorten duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay.The adverse reaction such as bradycardia should also be paid attention to.

关 键 词:右美托咪啶 咪达唑仑 随机对照研究 

分 类 号:R97[医药卫生—药品]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象