检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建勋[1,2] 童中翔[1] 樊晓光[1] 吴利荣[2] 陈超[2] 王超哲[1] 贾林通[1]
机构地区:[1]空军工程大学航空航天工程学院,陕西西安710038 [2]空军装备研究院复杂航空系统仿真重点实验室,北京100076
出 处:《红外与激光工程》2016年第3期69-78,共10页Infrared and Laser Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金(61203134)
摘 要:战斗机红外对抗效能评估是武器装备作战使用的关键,传统效能评估方法主要针对简单红外环境、固定作战态势和单一组件开展研究,不能充分反映红外对抗的真实性和全面性。基于此,提出了战斗机红外对抗效能评估方法,按照实战对抗过程,分成探测目标、占位和杀伤目标三个阶段进行研究,基于概率理论确定了不同阶段的概率权重,并建立了基于红外对抗全过程的效能评估方法,最终得到战斗机完成红外对抗任务的成功概率。对比分析结果表明了红外对抗效能评估方法的有效性和正确性,为战斗机红外攻击策略和防御策略的制定提供了理论依据。The effectiveness evaluation of fighter′ s infrared countermeasure is the key of operational use of weapon equipment. In allusion to simple infrared environment, fixed operational situation and single component, traditional effectiveness evaluation methods are researched, which can ′ t fully reflect the authenticity and exhaustiveness of infrared countermeasure. So the effectiveness evaluation method of fighter′ s infrared countermeasure was put forward. The process of infrared countermeasure that was divided into three phases was studied in accordance with actual countermeasure process, such as detecting target phase, occupying phase, and killing target phase. The probability weights of different phases were confirmed based on probability methodology. And an effectiveness evaluation method based on infrared countermeasure whole process was proposed. At last, the success probabilities of accomplishing fighter ′ s infrared countermeasure mission were obtained. Comparisons show that the effectiveness evaluation of infrared countermeasure is valid and correct, which can provide theoretical basis for infrared attacking strategy and infrared defensing strategy.
关 键 词:战斗机 红外对抗 效能评估方法 作战使用 概率理论
分 类 号:V279[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计] E926[军事—军事装备学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.16.26