检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150006 [2]大连理工大学人文与社会科学部,辽宁大连116024 [3]黑龙江省人民政府研究室,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《哈尔滨工程大学学报》2016年第3期468-473,共6页Journal of Harbin Engineering University
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(12AGL010);黑龙江省政府重大攻关课题资助项目(GC12D107)
摘 要:引入空间经济均衡模型对开发区发展转型公共治理水平提升的决定因素和作用机制进行分析讨论。研究表明,开发区发展转型公共治理的空间极化效应均衡基础是消费者均衡与生产者均衡的缘故。均衡分析表明,空间极化效应核心问题是实现生产要素的空间集聚。数字模拟分析表明,过度或者超前实施贸易自由化,对于开发区发展转型公共治理的效果并非能达到人们预期效果。数字模拟发现,当空间极化效应显著时,空间集聚租金呈现的"驼峰状"与"U"曲线交互作用与影响。现实的政策意义在于,当开发区发展转型公共治理的空间极化效应均衡时,细微的政策变化都能导致状态的改变。In this paper,a spatial economic equilibrium model is introduced for analyzing the determinants and mechanisms that enhance the level of development transforming to public governance in the zones. The results show that consumer and producer equilibria lead to an equilibrium of spatial polarization effects of development transforming to public governance in a development zone. Equilibrium analysis shows that the core problem with the spatial polarization effect is that it inhibits the realization of spatial agglomeration of the production factors. Numerical simulation results indicate that excessive or early implementation of trade liberalization will not achieve development transforming to public governance in a development zone with the expected effect. The numerical simulation shows that as long as the spatial polarization effect is significant,the spatial agglomeration of rents will present a " hump shape" interacting with a " U" curve. The actual policy significance is that when the spatial polarization effect of the development transforming to public governance in the development zone reaches equilibrium,even the subtle policy shifts can lead to changes in state.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30