两大法系背景下宪法程序性比较及其启示——以宪法权利保障程序为例  

Comparison of the Constitutional Procedure under the Background of the Two Law Systems and Its Inspiration——Taking the Procedure of Constitutional Rights Protection as An Example

作　　者：谭波[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期17-23,共7页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12CFX021)

摘　　要：两大法系背景下的宪法权利保障对比可以成为观察宪法程序性的重要视角。程序理念的融入对国家立宪与修宪有着先入与持续的影响,宪法程序对人身权利的关注更使其联系和表现于刑事诉讼化的程序之中且内容具体,司法救济渠道的入宪亦使宪法权利获得了程序性的补强。在上述诸方面的缺失则可成为我国宪法程序性攻坚和改观的重点与难点所在,效果可期。Comparison of the constitutional rights protection from the perspective of different law systems may be regarded as an important path to observe the constitutional procedures. The integration of procedural idea can initially and successively influence the legislation and amendment of the constitution. The emphasis on the personal rights from the constitutional procedure can make it connected with and embodied in the process of criminal suits.The incorporation of judicial relief into the Constitution strengthens the constitutional rights in a procedural way. The deficiencies in these fields may become the important but difficult issues that need to be improved and solved in China.

关 键 词：法系 宪法 程序性 启示 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]