检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏少琼[1]
出 处:《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第2期19-27,共9页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:人类总是倾向对于灾难进行归因与归责,以便控制并减少损害。归因聚焦于客观因果关系的再现,归责则包含更多的主观建构与解释过程。不同类别的灾难类型中的归责路径与归责逻辑有所不同。文章分别探寻其背后的归责过程及逻辑框架。研究发现:归责是特定时代及特定语境下意识形态的控制过程,是不同行动主体的利益表达过程,也是归责主体以替罪羊方式进行结构性压力释放与转移的过程。了解归责过程及归责逻辑、构建灾难中的归责框架有着重要意义。Human beings are inclined to attribute and impute disaster in order to control and reduce the dam- age. Attribution focuses on the representation of the objective causation, and imputation contains more subjective construction and interpretation process. The attribution path and the logic of different types of disaster are different. This paper explores the process and the logic framework, and finds that imputation is the process of ideology control in a special time and a special context, the interest expression process of different stakeholders. Imputation is also the process of the releasing and transferability of structural pressure by its subject in a form of scapegoat. It is im- portant to know the process and the logic, and to construct the imputation frame.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15